submit
submit

Brewerytown

Brewerytown

Challenge of creating an urban supermarket


Oct. 27

Previous coverage:

Final presentation

Midterm presentation


By Kellie Patrick Gates
For PlanPhilly

Community leaders in one Philadelphia fresh food desert say they have made significant progress toward building an oasis.

Angel Coleman, acting executive director of the Girard Coalition, recently took a representative from a company that finds locations for independent supermarket operators on a tour of the prospective site at 31st Street and Girard Avenue site and the neighborhoods that a supermarket built there would serve - Brewerytown, Strawberry Mansion, Fairmount and others.

That part of the city has a mixture of household incomes, but many residents are poor and have no cars. There are small corner stores that offer dry goods and convenience foods, but since the last supermarket closed more than a decade ago, the only place to get fresh produce has been in some other neighborhood. 

The lack of a grocery store also concerned the Westrum Development Company, which owns the site at 31st and Girard. Westrum has a nearby townhouse development, Brewerytown Square, and a supermarket would not only help current residents, but would make this part of the city, and the Westrum development, more attractive to new-comers.  So Westrum joined forces with the group of community leaders, who call themselves the West Girard Supermarket Coalition.

Coleman would not identify the independent market firm, which she said is now in negotiations with Westrum. Nor would she identify the supermarket operator she met with nor the developers who've called to express interest in the site, whom she also refers to Westrum. Coleman said she won't name any names until there's a concrete deal, but she cannot hide her hopeful enthusiasm.

"It's looking promising," Coleman said.

Yet all involved in the effort know that much work and many challenges remain, many central to the physical traits of the proposed location: It's a 2.8 acre, triangular site. There's very little frontage on the busiest street. And it has a steep slope.

"If you don't have higher incomes, and you are missing the large footprint they are looking for, you're really in trouble," Coleman said.

That's just the kind of design challenge that the Community Design Collaborative's Infill Philadelphia was looking for. Food access was the topic for the annual collaboration this year, and the Westrum site was among the three projects chosen. Westrum's Jamie Lindsay, a land acquisition analyst, and Coleman worked with designers from Interface Studio Architects to create a conceptual design for a 35,000 square-foot supermarket. The goal was not to wind up with the final blueprints, but rather with something that would convince a supermarket operator that a profitable market could be built on the small, irregularly shaped parcel in Brewerytown.

Through the Infill project, supermarket experts were made available to the design teams, both as consultants during the process and as jurors to critique the designs.

One juror - Brown’s Family ShopRite President Jeff Brown - said that some entrepreneur might find a way to operate a profitable grocery store at the site. But its small, irregular size, limited Girard Avenue frontage, and difficult access for delivery vehicles, among other factors, make it incompatible with the business models of stores operating in the area today, he said.

Yet, one consulting expert is the representative of the independent supermarket operators who recently went on that tour with Coleman. It was during the consulting that the company fell in love with the design, she said.

"To know that they are interested not just in our site but in the design, that's just delicious," Coleman said.

Design Collaborative program associate Carryn Golden welcomed the news that the site has generated interest. But she was also cautious: "While we’re very pleased to hear that discussions for the Girard Avenue supermarket project are advancing, we know from past experience, that this will likely be a long and complex process," she said.

Brown's Family ShopRite president Jeff Brown was familiar with the site even before he studied it and the design as an Infill juror. His company wants to build a store in the area, and management looked at the site, but rejected it.

"I think North Philly needs a grocery store, and should have one, somewhere. But not this site," he said. "We have a lot of stores in underserved areas, and we can make it work. But this site has too much, physically, going against it."

The site is really best suited for walkers and bikers, he said. There isn't room for enough parking, even considering that many residents don't drive.

Operators will want frontage on Girard Avenue, he said. "You could have a sign on Girard Avenue, but stores do the best when you can see the store from the main road." It would also be difficult to get delivery trucks onto the site, Brown said.

A smaller grocery store might work, something like a no-frills bargain-priced store with limited selection or a high-end, organic market. But the community coalition and Westrum want a store that occupies the middle ground between basic and swank.

There is a lot of diversity among the population the supermarket would serve, Westrum's Lindsay said. People of various financial means and different ethnicities would be customers, and she wants the supermarket to reflect that - both in the terms of the prices it charges and what type of foods it would carry.

Brian Phillips, principal architect with Interface Studios, said Brown told the group that most supermarket operators want the front door to face both the main thoroughfare and the parking lot. They also want just one entry point, which helps with both store flow and security.

Phillips said it didn't make sense to have the parking lot facing Girard Avenue - urban design calls for buildings to meet the street. The frontage on Girard is also small.

A parking lot for 120 cars is instead in the back, along the railroad tracks and hidden from the street. The entry faces that lot. There is also a large pedestrian walkway that connects the site to the neighborhoods and to Brewerytown Square - the Westrum Development.

In addition to the size and shape of the site, the 23-foot grade change also presented a design challenge, Phillips said. Under normal circumstances, the grocery would be at street level on Girard. But instead, shoppers would see some smaller retail establishments - things like a coffee shop and a drycleaner. The Supermarket frontage is on 31st Street. But, Phillips said, it will be obvious from the signage and name of the development - it's called Market 31 - that a supermarket is the anchor of the mixed-use development.

"There was no way to get a front entry off of Girard. You could force something onto the site, but if you did, it would compromise everything but the grocery store. We are deferring to neighborhood, to good urban building," Phillips said.

His firm worked on - and eventually did the builder's plans for - a residential development that was part of an earlier Infill project in 2005. Phillips hopes to do the same with this project.

Some design elements could and would likely be changed to meet the specific needs of the supermarket operator, Phillips said.

That makes sense to Westrum's Lindsay. "We’ll make adjustments once we have an operator," she said.

Brown said he likes the design. (So does the Philadelphia chapter of the American Institute of Architects, which gave it an award earlier this month.) The concept is interesting and tackles the problems of the site, as much as is possible, he said. And while he knows of no grocery store in existence in Philadelphia that he thinks could successfully operate there and meet the community's needs, an entrepreneur with different ideas might be willing to give it a try.

An independent operator or entrepreneur is the site's best hope, said Don Hinkle-Brown, who manages the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative, one of the partners in the Infill project. (The Fresh Food Financing Initiative, a program of the state's Department of Community and Economic Development, was created by Rep. Dwight Evans.) Hinkle-Brown is also president of The Reinvestment Fund, one of the organizations that manage the Financing Initiative.  His agencies provide funding to projects that most banks wouldn't touch, in the form of low-interest loans, grants, and assistance with federal programs. Through that effort, 61 new stores have opened in underserved places.

Jeff Brown, of Shopright, is absolutely right that the site is awkward, and that there is no supermarket operating anywhere like it in Philadelphia, he said.

But there are smaller-foot print stores in other U.S. cities, like New York and Washington, he said. Some have multiple stories. Some are in basements. Some have special, smaller carts, because the usual variety wouldn't fit.

And this sort of thing is de rigueur in Europe.

"If this were Switzerland, it would have been built yesterday," he said of the proposed store. "European urban environments have figured out how to do smaller spaces. In a lot of America, we still allow the car to dominate. And even in urban environments, we want big rectangles."
 
Hinkle-Brown believes an operator could be found. There are grocers in New York who want to bring their smaller-scale model here, he said. And if a store did open on the site and become successful, it would offer a new model for other high-density neighborhoods, he said.

And Infill's design is so interesting, Hinkle-Brown said, that people from other neighborhoods might choose to shop there just to see it.

But Hinkle-Brown said it is important to focus efforts on bringing a store to the underserved neighborhoods, whether or not it is with this design and at this site.

"I don't believe it's appropriate to get too many hopes up about 1 piece of dirt," he said.

The interest is a good sign, but there's still a long way to go before an operator signs on, negotiates an agreement of some sort with Westrum, and gets financing and the necessary approvals to build.

Adam Lang, a board member of the Brewerytown Sharswood Neighborhood Association and its representative to the Supermarket Coalition, agrees that the specific site doesn't matter.   "The important thing is having a grocery store in the neighborhood."

The area's last full service market was located at 27th and Girard.  And that's another site the community has its eyes on. Hinkle-Brown does, too. "If we end up having somebody say, 'I want 27 and Girard,' we'll be all over that," he said.

Coleman said she talks to developers about that site, too.

But Lang has talked to the owners of the former supermarket site about bringing a new supermarket there, and they are just not interested, he said.

That doesn't surprise Hinkle-Brown, who noted that grocery stores usually pay relatively low rents. But there's always room for negotiation, he said.

There's also an effort to start a food co-op in the community.  The 31st and Girard project would be eligible for Fresh Food Financing Initiative, since all three of this year's Infill Philadelphia projects were selected based on eligibility. And Hinkle-Brown said a co-op - so long as it wasn't just members-only who could shop there, could be, as well.

Lang said it's not just the interest in the Infill design that makes him feel like the Supermarket Coalition is closer to success than it's ever been.

In March, he organized a candidates' forum for the Coalition, and all pledged to find money for the Supermarket project. Other elected officials made similar promises at a recent Brewerytown Civic Association meeting, he said.

Meanwhile, for at least part of the year, there is some fresh-food relief for the West Girard neighborhoods. The West Girard Community Council began running a weekly farmers' market several years ago. Its success underlines the community's demand for fresh produce, Coleman said, and demand outpaces supply.

Contact the reporter at kelliespatrick@gmail.com

 

New SugarHouse archaeological report


 

July 10
By Kellie Patrick Gates
For PlanPhilly

SugarHouse Casino's latest archaeology report (see attached PDFs below) says much of the property that is now dry land was once beneath the Delaware River.

That finding excites both local historians and the elected officials involved in a battle with the casino over the right to build on state-owned, riverbed land. 

The historians and the president of the Philadelphia Archaeological Forum say knowing where the water was means knowing more precisely where waterfront buildings - including a British Fort - once stood.  That should help focus additional digging, they say.

But the report, which details work done by consultant A.D. Marble and a soil scientist, says further searching for the fort is futile. Extensive excavating for the fort has already taken place, the report says, and it is clear that any remains were destroyed by the building and demolishing of industrial sites that followed. A trove of Native American artifacts have already been recovered on the site. But the latest round of digging - which took place in May - makes it clear that the soil that might have contained other artifacts was also heavily disturbed to the point that any others would be destroyed, the report says.

"We are confident in the results of our actual geomorphological investigations, which have concluded that there is no evidence of the fort remaining on our site," spokeswoman Leigh Whitaker said.
 
The April dig also seems to have satisfied the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation, the federal agency tasked with overseeing the protection of the nation's historic resources. After completing a review of Marble's work Thursday afternoon, The ACHP said the recommendations it made in June had been satisfied, and it was now up to the Corps to determine how to proceed. Whitaker said SugarHouse would not comment on the ACHP's decision until it received official word of it.

Riparian issues

A.D. Marble's report says the Delaware River shoreline used to be just east of Penn Street, a considerable distance from the current place where solid land meets the river.

This delights Rep. Mike O'Brien, one of a group of local and state officials who want to convince the casino to build somewhere else. O'Brien said the dirt that lies between the historic river's edge and the current one is fill, and that fill is owned by the state. SugarHouse cannot build on it, he says, without legislative approval. "That site now becomes very narrow, and very long," he said. "Simply put, without the granting of riparian rights, it can't be developed."

SugarHouse disagrees with the assessment that finding the old edge of the river has anything to do with its modern fight to build on the site, which it owns.

Anything involving casinos is never simple, and this is no exception. SugarHouse was granted riparian rights, also called a submerged lands license, by the city's Commerce Department during the Street Administration.  The new administration revoked the license shortly after Mayor Michael Nutter took office. First they said the procedure had been faulty. Then they decided that they disagreed with the former city solicitor's assessment that a 1904 law gave the city the right to issue such a license in the first place. That right, for a project the size of SugarHouse, belongs only to the state legislature, the Nutter administration says. The legislature agrees.
 
SugarHouse attorneys, who found the 1904 law and brought it to the city's attention, maintain that it indeed gave the city the right to grant a riparian license, and that Nutter had no right to revoke it.  The legislators, including O'Brien, Rep. Bill Keller and Sen. Vince Fumo, say that the 1904 law only gave the city the right to grant licenses for water-borne commerce, not casinos. And that it was superceded by the Dam Safety and Encroachment Act, passed by the legislators in the 1970s.  SugarHouse attorneys say the 1904 law still stands.

The State Supreme Court has yet to rule in a case that will determine both if the city had the right to issue the license and if it had the right to revoke it.
 
But O'Brien says even if the Court upholds SugarHouse's license, it applies only to the land between the bulkhead and the pier-head - the spot beyond which piers cannot extend because they would invade the shipping channel. So SugarHouse would need to get legislative approval to build on the additional land, he said.  "We would still have an issue between the bulkhead and Penn Street."   

It's likely the courts will ultimately decide whether the historic river's edge has an impact on riparian land leases. O'Brien has already said that if the State Supreme Court finds in favor of SugarHouse, he will likely try to get the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the case as a state sovereignty issue. Thursday, he said that the definition of riparian lands used when the city granted the license to SugarHouse was faulty, and that a Supreme Court case from the 1800s defined riparian lands according to the position of the river when the Commonwealth was founded. O'Brien intimated that this, too, might be a matter for the U.S.'s top court to review.

SugarHouse had no comment about O'Brien's allegations regarding the river's edge.

History

While the lawyers and judges figure out the riparian lands issue, the history of the SugarHouse site is largely in the hands of the Philadelphia Division of the Army Corps of Engineers.

The historic review is necessary because SugarHouse needs a federal permit from the Army Corps to build its project as planned. The Philadelphia division asked the federal Council for Historic Preservation for its advice, and the Council in June recommended more searching for the fort and the river's edge. The Corp received the ACHP's letter on the same day it received Marble's report.

ACHP staff completed a review of the report Thursday afternoon.

“We have reviewed the report, and while we have not yet discussed its findings with the Corps or the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Officer, it appears that it substantially addresses the issues we raised in our June 25, 2008 letter to the Corps," Bruce Milhans, an ACHP spokesman, said in an email.

Another of the ACHP's recommendations was that the Philadelphia Corps office bring in an archaeologist to help them.  Skipper Scott from the Ft. Worth, Texas division of the Corps is now reviewing the reams of documents from this case. This includes the recommendations from the local neighborhood activists, historians, archaeologists and others who are serving as advisors - or consulting parties, said Corps spokesman Khaalid Walls.

"Assuming the Corps will soon be in a position to make a finding whether the applicant has made a “reasonable and good-faith effort” to identify historic properties, as required in our regulations, the next steps would be to determine the eligibility of the properties for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, assess project effects to those found eligible, and then work with the consulting parties to determine how best to reduce or mitigate those adverse effects,” Milhans said.

The Corps will not make any decisions regarding archaeology work at SugarHouse until Scott completes his review, Walls said. Walls said there was no timeline for when that might happen.

The consulting parties will also continue to have a say, and some of them are calling for much more work.

Amateur historian and professional preservationist Torben Jenk said that Marble is using a 1777 map that is inaccurate. It was not created by someone who saw the site, he said, but by someone who was in England, had never been here, and was making a map not for practical purposes, but to sell to English people who were fascinated by what was happening in the New World.

In short, Jenk said, SugarHouse is not finding the fort because they are not looking in the right place.

"The new report, I think, continues their whole contention that they've done enough, and it's not worth looking. I've said it from the beginning, and I'm still saying it: They don't want to find anything."

  "All of the maps referred to as part of the Section 106 process are accurate," Whitaker said.
Jenk and Douglas Mooney - the Archaeology Forum president - say SugarHouse has not looked at all for Batchelor's Hall - a social club where John Bartram is thought to have tended a garden and to which many of Ben Franklin's compatriots belonged.

Jenk said based on historical maps, the hall was located between two areas where Marble dug. The space between them is about 100 feet, Mooney said, and the hall was about 30 foot by 30 foot.

The report does recommend more digging in one area, where a square shaft-feature was found. The shaft was different from all others in shape and construction, and it contained cloth and other artifacts which the report says may be significant.

Mooney said that just the discovery of this shaft proves more digging is needed in this area - labeled as H2 on Marble's maps of the dig. This is the largest area of archaeology, a long narrow swath between Delaware Avenue and Penn Street.

"The previous HSP gaming stance has been that in area H2 there has been sufficient disturbance that privies and what not are likely not to be there, and that no more work was necessary because there was no chance of finding anything," he said. "In this supplemental testing, they found seven additional shaft features in that area, and one has been recommended for (complete) excavation. There is probably a large number of additional shaft features still within that section of the site, and they need to look for them."

Contact the reporter at kelliespatrick@gmail.com

Values consolidation under way

Some values from Queen Village
Some values from Queen Village



In January, there will be a consolidation of citizens' core neighborhood and waterfront values identified in three public sessions in December.

The values from the forums are listed below. They will be distilled down to seven or eight primary values:

The main consolidated “values” from the Dec. 14 session at Penn's Landing were:

  • Walk-ability - green space, the human scale, to walk without interruption, satellite parking
  • Safety - people on street, lighting, police protection, no slots barns
  • Ecological protection - green space, sewage, runoff control, green LEED construction.
  • Big Sky - green space vision, broad sight lines, public access to river’s edge, low lying buildings, density, open space
  • Diversity - cultural, economic, generational, ethnic, activity, occupational, business, ecological.
  • Historic preservation - our past.
  • River itself - recreation, industry, open space, drinking water, touch-ability, contemplation, history, dredging, no dredging
  • Integration of river with rest of the city.
  • Community – civic engagement.
  • Tension between the working river and pretty "playing" river.

“One of the most interesting things I heard was the organic relationship between the river and the land exemplified by the people who work on the river in boats,” said Ryan Berley of Old City.

The main "values" or takeaways from the Dec. 12 event in South Philadelphia were:

  • Valuing green space, open space
  • Sustaining the industrial port
  • Quality jobs on the waterfront are the economic engine for the city
  • Safety comes with traffic control, crime control, no fear, public transit
  • Sense of community that starts in the neighborhoods
  • Neighborhoods protect and enhance community as a whole
  • Protect the history, the traditions, the Mummers Parade
  • How schools and churches fit into the waterfront as icons
  • Appreciate the diversity of economics, ethnicity, culture in our neighborhoods
  • Get our arms around the long-term solutions vs. short term solutions

 

Finally, listed below are the values that were established during the first engagement forum, Dec. 11, in the Kensington-Port Richmond section of the city:

  • Safety - children can play outside, you can walk in the neighborhood
  • Family values - small businesses that thrive, places to worship, locally owned businesses.
  • Easy access - you can walk or bike or bus to it.
  • Diversity - ethnic, lifestyle, multi-generational, economic, diversity of uses, architecture.
  • Open space and green space - public spaces, playing spaces.
  • History - existing neighborhoods, old buildings, old architecture. Historic identities.
  • Jobs - river related and ports related jobs. Jobs for youth.
  • Green technology - work with the environment.
  • The plan - looking for something that protects the values already mentioned.
  • Recreation - using water and land where they meet. Recreation for families.
  • Affordable housing - for seniors.

 

    Brewerytown

    Brewerytown

    Neighborhood in the North Philadelphia district of the city. An unofficial region; Brewerytown runs approximately between the Schuylkill River's eastern bank and 23rd Street, bounded by Cecil B. Moore Avenue in the north and Parrish Street in the south.

    Syndicate content

    Events

    November 22nd 8:30 am

    Green Home Tour MORE

    November 22nd 9:00 am

    UC Green Fall Tree Planting Days MORE

    November 22nd 10:00 am

    Celebrate the new Pennypack on the Delaware Trail Extension MORE

    November 22nd 3:00 pm

    Public Art Tour: Philly's Got It Goin On MORE

    November 23rd 10:30 am

    University City Walking Tour MORE

    November 23rd 12:00 pm

    East Park Revitalization Alliance First Annual Fundraiser MORE

    See all Upcoming Events