Case Studies

Some examples of best practice principles as other cities create lasting visions for their waterfronts.

Case Study - Chattanooga

Chattanooga

Though only the fourth-largest city in Tennessee at 155,500 residents, Chattanooga has served as a model in urban waterfront revitalization since the city began its process twenty years ago.  A former industrial center, Chattanooga’s land along the Tennessee River was once so polluted that it bordered on uninhabitable.  This same land is now its primary tourist attraction. The City of Chattanooga’s riverfront vision, entitled “The 21st Century Waterfront,” was a $120- million, 129-acre project that used the Tennessee River as the primary resource to revive the city’s downtown.  Objectives central to the plan include:

  • Combine community knowledge with professional expertise
  • Focus on natural beauty that is green and “walkable”
  • Commit to issues of conservation, archaeology, and history
  • Develop a world-class tourist destination
  • Maintain a natural attraction to the river, above and below its surface
  • Appreciate art, both informal and formal, in natural settings

The return to the river is now complete; the river banks are now lined with an aquarium, art museum, children’s museum, carousel, theaters, green space, public art, and pedestrian bridge and promenades. Chattanooga’s main innovation was capitalizing on public-private sector partnerships that planned, funded, and implemented the project. 

Chattanooga planners used of public investment as a catalyst for private development, creating smart and attractive urban design along the waterfront with city and state dollars that encouraged private investment.  For example, while the three museums, public space and public art was funded by the government, the River Pier Landing received huge support from private developers, for retail as well as residential projects.  This has made Chattanooga a model of urban revitalization for cities nationwide.

Chattanooga’s success can also be attributed to its ability to integrate ongoing civic input into a vision that was guided by professionals who used urban design to spur the waterfront’s long-term revitalization.  Some of the riverfront’s urban design challenges included filling the river, constructing a major city pier, narrowing a busy roadway, reconnecting the waterfront to downtown, and redesigning its public spaces so that the waterfront would become a pedestrian-friendly district.

http://www.waterfrontchattanooga.com/

Case Study - Boston | Piers Park

Boston Piers Park is a 6.5-acre children’s playground that was built on Marginal Street along the East Boston riverfront in 1995. It answers the dense residential East Boston neighborhood’s need for public open space, and does so using play structures, and natural materials and forms to complement the waterfront.

The Park is owned and operated by the Massachusetts Port Authority, which sought to design a space that could address all adjacent neighborhood needs. The park reclaims an abandoned pier and provides direct pedestrian access to the waterfront. Two pavilions provide a place for people to enjoy great views of downtown across Boston’s inner harbor. The park also features a 600-foot promenade and paved trail system that weaves through the natural vegetation and landscaping of the park.

The granite seawall used in the park is the material that has guarded the contour of the structure since 1870. Along with the pedestrian walkways, there is also an amphitheater for public activities, a sailing center that provides direct access to Boston Harbor, an “outdoor fitness system” along the trails, and fencing for security.

The park’s success is in large part due to the fact that it was designed with significant participation from the community, and by designers that were sensitive to the public outreach process. Local residents affected wide-ranging decisions from the type of park furniture to the list of activities permitted at the park. The fact that citizen concerns were channeled into concrete proposals gave residents a sense of ownership over the park, which has contributed significantly to its success. Thanks to this level of involvement, Piers Park has programmed activity for all ages, places for public events, and a sense of security that creates a positive playing environment.

www.piersparksailing.org
www.bostonharborwalk.com
www.massport.com
www.boston.com/beyond_bigdig/cases/piers.htm

Case Study - South Boston Marine Park

Boston

South Boston Marine Park South Boston Marine Park is a new project designed and developed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (“MassPort”) on land it owns along the South Boston waterfront.  The delta-shaped park will be built on two parcels totaling less than 1.5 acres flanked on each side by tall office and hotel buildings.  Riverside restaurants are also planned with a great harbor view, and there will be public areas designed for sitting and gathering. The plan is to create a new public destination along the waterfront at the center of this new commercial and hotel complex. 

The park space became available after the straightening of D Street in South Boston, which will provide the neighborhood with direct auto access to the waterfront.  Tree canopies will provide shade and definition to the park’s edges, and a lawn graces the Northern Avenue end of the park that slopes up to increase views of the harbor.  The lawn centerpiece surrounded by trees present the public with a range of open space options.  The sidewalk along Northern Avenue is wide enough to accommodate a stage for public events, and the park contains a food stand with shaded seating area for patrons.

Marine Park, along with Piers Park, shows the value of the Port Authority, a company that has a vision along with power and financial resources.  Open space near a dense complex is important, and the addition of food services inside the Park makes it a popular destination.  The mix of natural element with man-made improvement — such as the lawn built to intentionally slope, and the trees planted to line the park edges — provide examples of clever and interesting design methods.  MassPort also incorporated authentically Boston design elements to identify it as a unique waterfront space, such as the “clam-shack.”

www.massport.com


www.bostonharborwalk.com


www.cityofboston.gov/parks/openspaces/main.asp


www.boston.com/beyond_bigdig/cases/south_boston.htm

Case Study - Providence

Providence

Providence is a model because its political leadership was willing to take risks, embrace a revolutionary idea, and put it into action. Dubbed the Renaissance City, Providence has experienced major changes in its form and function over the past quarter-century, many of them focused on the city’s rivers.

In the nineteenth century, the city was built around the Cove Basin, which supported industry and recreation. As industrialization increased, the rivers became heavily polluted and were eventually filled in to make room for more development. They were decked over early in the twentieth century, creating the “World’s Widest Bridge.” Although the “nuisance” of the river was hidden, the decking caused more problems than it solved.

In the late 1970s, a revolutionary planning movement began which envisioned a new waterfront for Providence. It proposed moving the rivers and Interstate 1-95, recapturng the historic Jewelry District, and creating a promenade along the entire length of the waterfront. William Warner is credited as being the visionary of this plan.

After 30 years, the long and difficult process of revitalizing downtown Providence continues today. Cooperation between local, state, and federal government, as well as civic and business leadership has kept the plan on track. Warner has been instrumental in the continuity of the plan, ensuring design control over the bridges and waterfront parks, and creating a welcoming environment that echoed Providence’s historic character. The waterfront walkways have once again become a gathering place for residents and visitors. Because of the revitalized waterfront, Providence has experienced a boom in real estate development. An urban shopping and entertainment center, hotels, and office buildings have been built downtown, with more to come as I-195 is relocated. The waterfront offers restaurants, an amphitheater, and seating

More Informaiton:

http://www.winterac.com/intro.htm

http://www.nps.gov/blac/planyourvisit/valley-sites-providence.htm

http://www.waterfire.org/main.html

http://www.asla.org/awards/2006/06winners/333_pv.html

Case Study - Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh is the second largest city in Pennsylvania located in the western part of the state. The heart of the city is positioned along the confluence of three rivers- the Ohio, Allegheny, and Monongahela Rivers. Due to this physical location, the city’s waterfront has always played an active role in the economy and identity of the city, from the city’s founding as military forts to its dominance in the steel industry.

As other cities with a manufacturing base declined in the 1970s and 1980s, Pittsburgh lost jobs, population, and a primary use of their waterfront. Since those days, Pittsburgh has struggled of reverse these trends, centered around the revitalization of their most valuable asset – their waterfront. In 1999, Mayor Tom Murphy appointed the Riverlife Task Force, a nonprofit organization established to create a vision “to make Pittsburgh’s urban waterfront one of the most spectacular in the world.” The group is a public-private partnership representing Pittsburgh’s most influential property owners, developers, civic and business leaders to engage in services that will facilitate the future development of “Three Rivers Park.”

Since 1999, the Riverlife Task force has held over 120 public meetings with community groups, river users, and professional associations to ensure that the vision would reflect the diversity of expectations that multiple stakeholders had for riverfront development. The Task Force works closely with developers to facilitate the projects while simultaneously allowing the emerging vision to be shaped and tested.

In 2001, Heinz Field and PNC Park were built as new homes for the Pittsburgh Steelers and Pittsburgh Pirates along the waterfront, and the city has created the Three Rivers Park and the Three Rivers Heritage Trail, a waterfront walkway uniting the city’s greenspace plan. A long list of capital projects remain to be realized as the Task Force and City of Pittsburgh move forward on their vision to make Pittsburgh’s waterfront a national model for waterfront revitalization.

More Information:

http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/rfp/

http://www.riverlifetaskforce.org/

http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/dt/


Case Study - Vancouver: Granville Island & False Creek

Vancouver: Granville Island & False Creek

Vancouver, British Columbia is a model city for the demonstration of redevelopment and revitalization success. In the recent past, the city has transitioned from a primarily “port city,” to a world class destination for tourism, urban living, and entertainment, with one of the fastest growing economies in the West.

Geographically, the central city is surrounded by water, including the Burrard Inlet, the Fraser River, and False Creek cuts into the middle of the developed downtown, and due to its shallow depth, was always the “secondary” body of water. However, today, False Creek is central to the rebirth of Vancouver’s downtown lifestyle. Cooper’s Park, including the Marinaside Crescent seawalk, lines the section of new residential highrises, attracting hundreds of bikers, walkers, and joggers a day.  

On the opposite side of the “Creek” is Granville Island, an industrial reclamation and redevelopment project  that is heralded as one of the most successful public spaces in the world. The city transformed this brownfield industrial site into a mixed-use development with residences, artist studios, light industry, a marina, and a vast marketplace complete with a farmer’s market, a brewery, restaurants, and indoor and outdoor public space. The success that is Granville Island represents a long range joint planning strategy of the Canadian federal government and the City of Vancouver in the 1970s.

The Granville Island Trust was founded in 1976 to manage the project, and it was improved in 1978. A capital project totaling $19 million improved the physical space with walkways, roads, and play areas. Then artists’ studios and retail began to fill the space, and today it continues to be one of a great public space, both for tourists and Vancouver’s inhabitants. 

The island benefits from the character of the former industrial buildings and even retained the preexisting railroad tracks to create pedestrian walkways.  The entire False Creek waterfront is united by the Seawalk, a recreational trail that maintains public access to the water at all points. It connects residential neighborhoods, to the University of British Columbia, to the forthcoming Olympic Village.

The establishment of the Seawalk has been crucial to the success of False Creek’s rise to one of the premier urban areas in the world. Vancouver’s strategy for False Creek shows that waterfront redevelopment projects adjacent to downtown areas can succeed if they are well-planned, make the best use of the existing assets of the site, and have a sustained vision for long term implementation.

More Information:

http://www.pps.org/great_public_spaces/one?public_place_id=99

http://www.discovervancouver.com/GVB/granville-island.asp

http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/commsvcs/planning/

Case Study - Portland, Oregon

Portland

Portland, Oregon is the largest city in the state and a major city in the Pacific Northwest, located along the Columbia and Willamette Rivers. Although the city is remarkable for its precedents in planning and growth management, it has had its fair share of challenges in sustaining its downtown and its waterfronts.

The Willamette River runs through the city, bisecting the central business district from its western portion. The decline of industry and the presence of national interstates along its banks made development a priority for the city in recent decades and remains to be currently.

Portland’s Eastbank Esplanade is a well-used riverfront park and trail that provides an innovative form of access and connectivity along and across the Willamette River, despite the presence of the massive Interstate 5 freeway just yards to the East. The Esplanade facilitates North-South movement along the East bank of the river, extends the Willamette Greenway trail that covers both sides of the Willamette for the entirety of downtown Portland, and provides public spaces for recreational activities and community events. Bicyclists, runners, commuters and fishers can be observed enjoying the space year-round.

The South Waterfront District is a mixed use redevelopment district being developed by the same developer that kickstarted the successful Pearl District development a decade ago. The latter development was aided by public investment in infrastructure and a TIF-funded streetcar line. The South Waterfront is similarly supported with TIF financing and will accompany an extension of the streetcar into land formerly used as shipbuilding yards and warehousing. The new neighborhood will consist of a mix of high-rise residential towers, ground level retail, academic buildings for several local universities, a riverfront trail and a public park.

Portland’s waterfront development projects are geared at creating active uses and aiding in linking Portland’s diverse neighborhoods and districts back to the rivers. The River Renaissance, run through the city’s planning department, is geared at planning and development for all things related to the Willamette river. The waterfront is viewed not as a discrete development project, but as an ongoing, layered approach to making the most of one of the city’s finest assets.

More Information:

http://www.portlandonline.com/planning/index.cfm?c=42540

http://www.portlandonline.com/river/

http://www.pdc.us/ura/river.asp

Case Study - San Francisco

San Francisco

San Francisco’s shoreline was one of the busiest areas of foot traffic in the world in the early 20th century. However, following the construction of the Bay Bridge and the decline of ferries, the area fell into decline. The rise of the automobile led to the Embarcadero Freeway being built in the 1960s, improving auto access to San Francisco but dividing the waterfront from downtown.

But the combination of a natural disaster and community opposition led to a total transformation of the shoreline and the creation of one of the most dynamic waterfronts in the country. After being severely damaged in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the highway was torn down in 1991. After the freeway had been cleared, massive redevelopment begun as a grand palm-lined boulevard (named the Embarcadero after the ill-fated elevated freeway) was built, squares and plazas were created and restored, and railroad lines were extended to run along it.

Sited precisely where the freeway once walled off San Francisco’s waterfront, the new five-acre Ferry Building Plaza provides needed public open space and access to the water’s edge. The plaza accommodates a transit stop as well as ferry boat passengers, and complements the historic Ferry Building. Built in 1891 with the ferry industry at its peak, the Building is now an upscale commercial office center and local food marketplace; this mix of uses brings activities and visitors to the plaza. Other features of the plaza include the colonnade of palm trees that mark the center of the city at San Francisco water’s edge, the streetcar service restored by citizen volunteers, and the decorative trolley sheds designed to protect waiting passengers from the sun. The programming of the Plaza shows how important it is to complement open space with a density and mix of uses—the error of past designs can be seen in Market Street, which reaches the Embarcadero one block past the Ferry Building, missing an incredible opportunity to lead San Francisco’s most important thoroughfare into a historic plaza.

Another destination along the Embarcadero boulevard is Rincon Park, a public space that echoes shapes of the harbor and establishes a new and lively destination on the San Francisco Bay. It is about one-half mile up from AT&T Park, the waterfront stadium built for the San Francisco Giants baseball team in the mid-1990s. Designed by Philadelphia’s Olin Partnership, the two-acre parcel uses grass, trees, stone walls, and public art to provide citizens with views of the Bay and Berkeley Hills. Its canted lawn-berms are designed to protect the park from traffic on the Embarcadero. A public space designed to attract people, Rincon Park also houses 20,000 square feet of commercial space to maintain a high level of activity. The $2 million price tag for the park’s grass and trees will be financed by GAP Inc., whose world headquarters front the park from across the Embarcadero. Part of the commercial revenue will be dedicated to managing and maintaining the open space.

There is also Crissy Field, a major public park and seashore beach that replaces an obsolete military field. The field is the new gateway to San Francisco, one-hundred acres of open space where the city meets the bay. It is an interesting example of environmental reclamation in which a defunct industrial use is replaced by public open space. Entirely man-made, Crissy Park comprises three landscape domains: an always-changing tidal basin, a rolling lawn, and a picnic area sheltered by newly-created dunes. Crissy Field gives visitors the opportunity to stroll the promenade, have a picnic, participate in programmed activities, or simply enjoy the views. Crissy Field was restored thanks to $34.4 million in private donations and community support, and was opened in May 2001. Part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the largest urban national park in the world, the Field attracts 2-4 million visitors per year, depending on San Fran’s quirky weather.

http://san-francisco-pictures.com/articles/embarcadero-center-sf.html

http://www.inetours.com/Pages/SFNbrhds/Embarcadero.html

http://www.ferrybuildingmarketplace.com/

 

Case Study - Barcelona

Barcelona

Barcelona’s old waterfront on the Mediterranean was much like Philadelphia’s on the Delaware: old industrial land cut off from pedestrians by a highway. However, Mayor Pasqual Maragall changed the face of Barcelona’s shores in his 15 years as mayor from 1982 to 1997. Growth in the city was once focused away from the waterfront, exemplified by the placement of its highway near the water, cutting it off from the rest of Barcelona and making it a polluted site. The Citadel also made attempts to move Barcelona to the water quite difficult. However, the city’s plan for the 1992 Olympic Games changed all that. Maragall put the highway underground, thus reconnecting the city with its waterfront. On this newly-open land, he fashioned new beaches, parks, and neighborhoods.

Local officials had the insight to approach their Olympics plan as a major restructuring of the city: the Games last only three weeks, and its infrastructure improvements can be used to benefit the city in the long run. The possibility of the Olympics showed what sort of changes needed to be made to Barcelona’s waterfront, and the high-profile nature of the Games expanded the possibilities for transformation and urban improvement. Maragall used the money the Games brought to reshape the city’s form by forging an open, well-defined relationship to the sea.

The Ramblas, one of the oldest and most famous boulevards in the world, is the spine that connects the water to the city. Its broad 40-foot wide pedestrian strip down the middle, lined with trees and commercial activity, always has it humming with people and makes for a great entrée to Porta Vell (the “Old Port”), a new harbor development of restaurants, night clubs, parks, and other activities. Porta Vell connects to the Ramblas via a pedestrian bridge that crosses a marina. Further east is Olympic Village, a new neighborhood mix of public and private housing built from scratch: once the housing for athletes in 1992, it is now a new piece of the city. Integrating Olympic Village into the Barcelona fabric required reconstructing the highway so that it now ran underground, an arduous reorganization of railroad, sewage, and water infrastructure that proved incredibly valuable. Finally, at the edge of the sea opposite Olympic Village, the city built a broad new beach, for which sand continually must be imported.

Barcelona used public-sector funding to leverage private investment, a familiar technique today that was not common 15 years ago. The federal government spearheaded beach development and the suppression of the highway, which inspired private investors to partially support Olympic Village’s conversion into private housing. These projects spurred private development all along the waterfront, particularly at the Porta Vell development. The beaches, parks, and streets remain public, with a lot of civic involvement necessary to maintain them.

Spain’s centralized government makes it a difficult comparison with the United States, but Barcelona remains an interesting lesson in sound urban design and planning practices. Barcelona produced a city fragment well integrated in terms of urban development: architecturally innovative and socially diverse.

http://www.travelinginspain.com/barcelona/barcelon_harbor.htm

http://portfocus.com/spain/barcelona/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barcelona